Trump UFC Event at White House Cleared by Federal Judge

The White House can move forward with a UFC event on the South Lawn after a federal judge rejected a last-minute effort to block the show. The event is scheduled for Sunday, which coincides with Flag Day and President Donald Trump's 80th birthday.

The Details: U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta on Friday denied a request from two activists seeking to stop the UFC event, which is being held as part of celebrations marking the nation's 250th anniversary. The lawsuit was filed by a group called the Public Integrity Project on behalf of two Virginia residents. Mehta ruled that the plaintiffs likely lacked legal standing and failed to show they would suffer irreparable harm if the event proceeds. He also noted that organizers had been planning the event for months and said the lawsuit was filed too late to justify emergency intervention.

Plaintiffs' Argument: The plaintiffs argued that the event improperly uses federal property for commercial purposes and lacked required approvals. The lawsuit alleged that the event violated National Park Service regulations governing commercial activities on federal land and bypassed required environmental and congressional review processes. The plaintiffs described the event as an improper commercial use of a national landmark. The White House called the lawsuit "obstructionist" and argued that the event is part of the administration's broader semiquincentennial programming.

For Context: The UFC card is one of several events planned to commemorate the United States' 250th anniversary. Other proposals include an IndyCar race near the White House and a state fair on the National Mall. Trump has long been associated with UFC and is a friend of UFC CEO Dana White. In 2019, he became the first sitting U.S. president to attend a UFC event.

How The Media Covered It: Media coverage across the political spectrum largely focused on the judge's decision to allow the event to proceed. Fox News (Right bias) emphasized the court's reasoning that the plaintiffs lacked standing and highlighted the scale of the event, including its cost, planning and expected audience. The Associated Press (Lean Left) focused more on the plaintiffs' allegations that the UFC event improperly uses public property for private gain, while also noting the White House's response that the lawsuit was baseless.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission.